The cats owner, Andrew Boyd, described the sentence as a "disgrace". When Mr Boyd contact police after the vet told him his cats had been poisoned, officers found the remnants of the deadly meal and a cat-scaring machine still in Hall's garden
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24227/242278d0b85fc777157afde9ad63283e9701685d" alt=""
Hall was found guilty of causing unnecessary suffering to the pets, named Nush and Mr Baz, by feeding them a drug or substance knowing it to be poisonous or injurious. Defence agent Murray Aitken said: "Mrs Hall knows she put out the tuna, and she highly regrets that decision. She's had death threats because of it, and it's negatively affected her health, so it's definitely a decision that will live with her for the rest of her life."
Sheriff Craig Caldwell ordered Hall to pay Mr Boyd £1,500 in compensation, but stopped short of imposing a fine or calling for background reports as a preliminary to imposing community service or jail. He told her: "I take a dim view of cruelty to animals, and you should have known mixing tuna with anti-freeze would cause serious damage."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/baf8b/baf8b27b377b9b8e7f29edb0d69690a2a96ea843" alt=""
Mr Boyd said he and his wife Wilma had been devastated by the deaths of their pets and said Hall had got off lightly. He said he had paid more than £500 in vet bills to try and save the animals, which were put to sleep on 2 and 6 October 2008.
He said: "I think the punishment should have been more severe. I don't want to see anyone going to jail, but she should have been banned from having animals, and given community service at least. The sentence was a disgrace. Money was the last thing I wanted out of this."
No comments:
Post a Comment